QUOTE (JZZ @ Sep 3 2009, 02:32 PM)

My own opionion is that the jury is still on on all this hormone stuff and what protects the breast etc. Yes, we do need some periodic P to protect the uterine lining (that has been proven).
But in regard to protecting the breast tissue from E I tend to disagree. Breast cancers can test positive for E, Progesterone or HER2 receptive (or a combination). Many women never take b/hrt and still end up with cancer in breast, uterus, etc. And only 20 percent of women who develop breast cancer have a family history of it.
My own feeling is that one needs to work with their doc and listen to their bodies. If you are intolerate for example, of bio P, then try something else (synthetic or another bio P). Why force the issue of one being "better" than the other just because of current marketing? Ok I must stop now. I could write volumes. lol Anyway going on vaca for long weekend but will check in on Weds. Have a great weekend. Regards, JZZ
You have a great weekend too JZZ....
Just wanted to post this before I get busy with sending one son off to his 3rd year at University and getting the other two ready for high school on Tuesday morning.....(so much to do).
I don't believe that any one particular hormone replacement form is better than another. I've taken Provera, Prometrium and compounded transdermal P and I don't like any of them and am thinking that my last resort may be Prochieve or Crinone. I am hoping that one of these will not bother me like the others do.
I am willing to give cycling it in a try also. If I bleed slightly after stopping a cycle I can handle that.
Really, all I want is to stop some of the less annoying symptoms (hot flashes, insomnia, incontinence, slight anxiety) by using a small amount of E. I'd be really happy if I didn't need to take any P at all, but I'll try anything once.....;-)